Thermographic Survey of Air Leakage

The air tightness of the building is still falling short of the Passivhaus requirement of 0.6 Air Changes per Hour at 50 Pascals of pressure – the last test came in at around 0.9. Clearly that means there’s more air leakage than there should be but the problem has been in locating where the leakage is happening in order to fix it.

The architect, the contractor and myself all made enquiries and it became evident that the most practical approach was to do a thermographic (i.e. thermal camera) survey following the procedure defined in “BS EN 13187:1999 Thermal performance of buildings – Qualitative detection of thermal irregularities in building envelopes – Infrared method”.

The main challenge with this procedure is that it relies on a significant temperature difference between the inside and the outside of the building (at least 10 degrees and ideally more) in order to show where air leakage is either heating or cooling the surfaces. Since the air tight barrier is on the inside, the basic approach is to:

  • Heat the inside of the building to a consistent temperature of more than 20 degrees
  • Use a blower door to de-pressurise the inside of the building so that external air is drawn in through the air leaks
  • Use a thermal camera to check for cold spots caused by the outside air causing cooling around the air tight barrier

For this to work best, the outside air wants to be as cold as possible – which also means the external surfaces must not be heated by the sun. The ideal time to do the test is therefore in winter (when the outside air is cold) and before dawn (when all of the external surfaces have cooled down overnight and not yet received any sunlight). The perfect time of year is around the end of December, when dawn is relatively late and the outside temperature is generally cold.

The equipment and skills required are quite specialised and only a few consultants offer this service. I contacted Apex Acoustics (largely on the basis of them having a Midlands office in Nottingham) who provide air tightness consultancy alongside acoustic consultancy. It turned out their thermographic expert is Mark Siddall (well known in the UK Passivhaus community) who is based near the Apex Acoustics main office in Gateshead.

The survey was completed this morning and showed a significant leak in a store room above the balcony and a few minor leaks elsewhere. I’ll update this post with some of the thermal camera photos when I get them from Mark.

The plan is now to fix the leak above the balcony and to check what that does to the overall air tightness figure, with the hope that it will be enough to enable Passivhaus certification.

Blower door doing its thing during Thermographic Survey

Week 80, Day 5

Week 80, Day 5:

  • No further progress on the zinc around the windows; not sure if that was because of the heavy rain in the morning or if the team had other commitments. Now expecting that to be finished early next week.
  • The Final Certificate from MFA Building Control arrived in yesterday’s post, following a final inspection a couple of weeks ago and some follow-up paperwork to show evidence that the electrical, ventilation and heating systems had all been signed off.
    • While the building is now officially Complete from a Building Regulations standpoint (the unfinished zinc around the windows doesn’t affect that) there will be a separate certificate from the Architect when all of the work within the scope of the build contract is completed (and then a further certificate when all evident defects have been addressed).
    • One of the key things triggered by the Building Regulations Final Certificate is the 3-month window for the VAT reclaim on eligible items which were not zero-rated at source – seeĀ
Week 80, Day 5

Week 80, Day 5